Keep in mind those are all abstracts with titles and stories applied. The actual art could have been made in the 1980s with a different set of titles and stories.
Aesthetically has anything been added in the actual paintings or prints?
Importantly is there a generational divide with digital art? Galleries are flatfooted in trying to sell older artistic approaches. That does not bother them. Galleries are not bothered by what is actually happening in the artworld but in what they can package and sell. There can be major divides in that.
The prints were digital but again older techniques.
