Browse millions of wholesale art prints from 1+ million independent artists and iconic global brands. Receive 25 - 75% off Fine Art America prices!

Return to Main Discussion Page
Discussion Quote Icon

Discussion

Main Menu | Search Discussions

Search Discussions
 
 

Marcio Faustino

4 Years Ago

Should I Mark A Bare Butt As "not Safe Work"?

I have some photographs to upload where the model is completely nude, but there is no frontal nude. The image is from the back of the model where her butt is exposed. Does it has to be market as "Not Safe Work"?

Reply Order

Post Reply
 

Mike Savad

4 Years Ago

if you think it should, then it should just to be safe. hard to know what people think is not safe...


----Mike Savad
http://www.MikeSavad.com

 

Marcio Faustino

4 Years Ago

Mike,
I actually think it should not (from my point of view it is not offensive and not unsafe if it shows no nipples and no sexual part). But I am aware that people with different culture and education (or for religion reason) about the body the butt, for them, may be seen as sexual part. My question is if FAA cares about those who may feel offended or if FAA does not care about them.

 

Abbie Shores

4 Years Ago

Of course FAA cares about offending people.

 

Marcio Faustino

4 Years Ago

"Of course FAA cares about offending people."

It's not what I said.

What I said:
"But I am aware that people with different culture and education (or for religion reason) about the body the butt, for them, may be seen as sexual part. My question is if FAA cares about those who may feel offended or if FAA does not care about them."

In order words, I am asking if FAA cares about the people who may feel offended with bare butt for seen it as sexual.

 

Bradford Martin

4 Years Ago

It seems a large portion of the time when I log in there is a recently sold photo of 2 naked men showing off their penises. I have no control over that and is not something I want peole to see when logging in to FAA. So I don't see how FAA cares about offending people. This happened at least twice this week. Of these are marked not safe, why are they paraded on log in? Hmmm

 

Abbie Shores

4 Years Ago

You asked the same question again

"My question is if FAA cares about those who may feel offended or if FAA does not care about them."

My answer is the same

Or are you asking

"My question is if FAA cares about those who may feel offended or if FAA does not care about the images."

Bare bottoms do not offend most people but they need to be covered is any genitalia shows

Bradford, I agree. They should not be shown

 

Mike Savad

4 Years Ago

people shouldn't be looking at pictures at work anyway. but naked is naked, and it probably should be censored. i remember seeing a painting of a lady on a bed, not that naked, and someone called that person a prostitute for some reason. when in doubt, just mark it.


----Mike Savad
http://www.MikeSavad.com

 

Marcio Faustino

4 Years Ago

"Bare bottoms do not offend most people but they need to be covered is any genitalia shows"

That answer my question. Thank you.

 

Edward Fielding

4 Years Ago

Most people doing computer work are working from home these days.

But maybe we need a rating system? Mark your images G for all ages, PG, PG-13, and R.

Even at the Tate Modern, they had an exhibit of modern art that was off-limits to anyone under 16.

 

Jessica Jenney

4 Years Ago

Strange that you can see the thumbnails on images marked as not work safe

 

Abbie Shores

4 Years Ago

We've always seen the thumbnails on work marked unsafe. It's the only thing I totally disagree with Sean on.

 

This discussion is closed.