Browse millions of wholesale art prints from 1+ million independent artists and iconic global brands. Receive 25 - 75% off Fine Art America prices!

Return to Main Discussion Page
Discussion Quote Icon

Discussion

Main Menu | Search Discussions

Search Discussions
 
 

Ernest Agoba

7 Years Ago

Faa Widget And Logo Problem

I have actually finished building an e-commerce website for my artworks. I am interested in embedding the FAA iframe widget which can enable me to sell through their site. Problem is I wouldn't want their logo displayed or have my customers know that I'm printing through their service. Is there no way of circumventing around this?

Reply Order

Post Reply
 

Jessica Jenney

7 Years Ago

Does the widget have the FAA logo?

 

Mike Savad

7 Years Ago

i think there is a way to integrate your artist website and put it into your own website. it would look like a part of your site with your branding on it... provided you don't use watermarks, because it will show fineart for that. i forget how that's all done though.


---Mike Savad
http://www.MikeSavad.com

 

Ernest Agoba

7 Years Ago

Very funny Mike. What I'm avoiding is the FAA logo which eventually appears on my images. Beside, you don't remember how it's done

 

Mike Savad

7 Years Ago

the logo is on the watermark you have on there. you may want to re-ask the question, how to integrate the artist website into your private website.


---Mike Savad
http://www.MikeSavad.com

 

Jessica Jenney

7 Years Ago

edit an image and then in display options toggle watermark so it doesn't say yes

 

Adele Buttolph

7 Years Ago

I use one of the FAA widgets on my site and the FAA logo does not show up anywhere. You can take a look at the link below to see how it looks.

https://adelembuttolphgallery.com/shop/

 

Ernest Agoba

7 Years Ago

Hi Adele, the reference to your link in your response was quite helpful. Did you achieve this through the premium account? Where you have to sell an original on your site, are there hindrances to using the widget?

 

This discussion is closed.